Let's Japan.org Debunking Eikaiwa and Ramblings in Japan

The Fukuoka General Union has a long read titled The ALT Scam that points out the problems with BOEs outsourcing ALT jobs.

The main points are:

1. ALT jobs have been deemed a "service" so local governments can save money and avoid the management of foreign employees.
2. It is illegal for sub-contracted ALT teachers to work at public schools
3. ALTs/Dispatch companies don't know if they will get the next job/contract
4. Most ALT jobs advertised will not eventuate because they do not exsist and nobody knows if they will eventuate
5. Dispatch companies take big margins and the more they squeeze the ALT the more profit they make
6. Sub-contract ALTs are in reality double taxed losing 5% to consumption tax
7. Dispatch companies make profits from not enrolling ALTs in SH
8. A sub-contract ALT has practically no recourse if the school deems them sub-standard
9. BOEs ignore the Ministry of Education directive to employ ALTs directly
10. The BOE has no way of knowing if the dispatch company is breaking labour laws

Get a cup of your favorite beverage and read it all...

h/t Mogura

The latest development in the dirty undertaking of dispatch teaching:

A labor union of foreign workers requested Monday that the Aichi prefectural board of education address the concerns of English-language instructors at public schools who they say are working under illegal contracts.

The General Union, based in the city of Osaka, said an investigation it conducted last month and communications with municipal boards of education show that foreign teaching assistants in 16 school districts in the prefecture are contracted by private language schools or other agents rather than the school boards themselves.

The union charges that by going through agencies, the school boards are "avoiding the obligation of hiring them directly that comes after a certain period of (temporary) employment has elapsed."

It's all slowly coming to a head. Nothing illustrates the situation better than this 2005 letterfrom the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) acknowledging that gyomu itaku (outsourcing contracts) are illegal.

This notice was sent to all prefectural BOEs, and advises that they give preference to JETs, direct hires, and legal dispatch jobs over gyomu itaku with private dispatch companies. It also recommends that skilled ALTs be made permanent employees （正社員）.

Paragraph 3 in the appendix also contains some noteworthy items. It notes that dispatch contracts can only be made with ministry-approved dispatch companies and that BOEs should make sure they are dealing with approved companies before entering into a contract. It also notes that dispatch contracts are valid for 3 years whereupon the ALT must be made a permanent employee.

This letter is the kind of thing that should lay the foundation for ALT positions to be decent jobs, but instead, what we have is a terrible triangle.

BOEs: Lazy and cheap. They want ALTs in classrooms but don't want any of the hassles that come with having to manage foreigners. They know that dispatch companies can be unscrupulous but use them anyway. They like the steady supply of cheap instructors but aren't smart enough to figure out why the teacher turnover is so high.

MEXT: The letter shows that they are aware of illegal hiring practices, but they aren't doing anything beyond issuing guidance. This particular letter was written in 2005, and clearly nothing has been done in the past 4 years. Recall the fate of Samantha, covered by NHK in 2007. Fast forward to the present, and we still have the same abuses happening to ALTs like Robert and Eric.

ALTs: For some unknown reason, despite the information one can find on the internet about dispatch companies and teaching in Japan, teachers still insist on being taken advantage of by their employers. They work for low pay and no benefits because they'd rather not give up on their dream/fantasy/plan of living in Japan.

Where is the breaking point? There is absolutely no justification to put up with such terrible working conditions. At what point does the whole mess collapse under the weight of its own bullshit? Who takes the first step in breaking the triangle? Do the BOEs smarten up? Does MEXT do something beyond issuing memos? Do ALTs quit in droves or strike for better working conditions?

Old news is fun! The Japan Times reports on Yano Research's survey on the foreign language learning market in Japan, which I wrote about this at the beginning of August and touched on again earlier this month. The only difference with today's article is that the JT spoke with somebody at GEOS.

Susumu Ikegami, a spokesman for Geos Corp., which runs English-language schools in Japan and other countries, said they have been facing a serious decline.

"As the number of students decreased, the number of classrooms also declined," said Ikegami, who declined to give the figure for the classrooms.

Ikegami said the market's downward trend began about five years ago, although the reason is hard to pinpoint. However, he pointed out that the bankruptcy of Nova Corp. in October 2007 had some impact.

It's amazing that Ikegami can't figure out why business is down. You can try and blame NOVA, Lehman Brothers, or swine flu, but you can only wring so much mileage out of those excuses. The article ends with this brilliant plan:

However, Ikegami of Geos said the overall outlook for the language-school market in Japan doesn't appear bright.

"We have 53 schools overseas, and they are doing pretty well. So, while there is the chance of growth from a global outlook, we don't really have a good picture for the Japanese market. Rather than getting more students, we are working to run the business more economically," Ikegami said.

Things don't look good down the road, so let's cut costs? That's it? The market has been sliding for years and GEOS is still at the cut costs/efficiency stage? The article is titled "Few answers for the language market." Is the problem about finding answers to the downturn or the dreadful way in which eikaiwa schools conduct business?

My guess is that it's the latter, with NOVA being the straw that broke the camel's back. All the schools really care about is putting bums in chairs and vacuuming their students' wallets, and NOVA was the poster child of this kind of behavior. METI's press release　describes it in vivid detail, from pressure sales to exaggerated advertising to underhanded refund practices to outright thievery and deception. Other schools have tried to blame its instructors for the failings of the company or sue them for exercising their right to strike.

But the bad behavior doesn't stop at eikaiwa. Dispatch teaching is just as bad. Not only does the job have no benefits, instructors are disposable employees that boards of education pick and choose from and discard at will. Although teaching English looks promising in elementary schools, it should not be forgotten that the potentially lucrative job scene hinges on school budgets. BOEs with no money are more likely to stick with a Japanese teacher than hire an ALT.

The homestay business is more of the same. Gateway21 tore a page from the NOVA playbook with 950 million yen vanishing into thin air as the end result.

To put it bluntly, the rot is extensive, and teachers and students know it. But if the Susumu Ikegamis of the business can't understand why business is bad, then there's not much hope for them. What's the answer that eikaiwas should be looking for? How about: Stop abusing your employees and ripping off your customers?

The Yomiuri Shimbun, via Yahoo!, has a story about the dark underbelly of ALT dispatch companies as English will become a compulsory subject in the fifth and sixth grades in 2011.

For example, schools have to deal with the constant turnover of ALTs. One BOE member in Saitama related that he is on his 4th ALT quit since April. This revolving door of teachers is not conducive to learning.

A contributing factor to the revolving door are the dispatch companies themselves. The low salaries ALTs receive guarantees they won't be around for very long. A principle in Saitama noted that the dispatch company that won the contract for his school placed a bid that was ¥310,000 per ALT lower than the bids last year.

Figures from the education ministry show that 25% schools use the JETs while the remainder rely on dispatch companies. The principal in Saitama adds that his city has a contract with a dispatch company to provide approximately 20 ALTs to more than 40 elementary, junior, and senior high schools, and knows that the company has cut the salaries, bonuses, or in some cases both, of ALTs who missed half a day due to illness. He says that he will no longer be able to provide quality education if the number of unscrupulous dispatch companies increases.

The increase in dispatch companies took a noticeable leap in 2006 when it was announced that English would be a compulsory subject in elementary schools. But this was when ALTs in the JET Programme were directly hired. An increasing number of school boards now don't want to be bothered with having to hire, house, or find replacement ALTs, which is why they find dispatch companies so appealing.

The problems described in the Yomiuri article are further illustrated in a news special on ALTs. Like their Japanese counterparts, contract teachers have zero job security. Part 1 starts with Lara, who came to Japan to study pottery. She's teaching twice a week, and lucky for her, she is directly employed by her BOE. She is one of the lucky ALTs. She loves her job and the kids like her lessons. Then there are the less fortunate ALTs like Robert, who was summarily fired from his job 5 months before his contract expired. His lunch consists of bean sprouts and a small cut of salmon. He has to pinch his pennies because he hasn't found another job. When he tried to get an answer from his dispatch company as to why he was dismissed, they told him that the BOE wanted a change in ALTs. To illustrate how bad the conditions are, the news program asked a room of parents and students if their ALT had ever changed during a year. They answered, "Yes," with one boy saying he had 7 or 8 different teachers.

In part 2, we're treated to more problems. Eric has no savings and made only ¥112,000 in December and ¥150,000 in January. Although he's been working for 3 years, he's been on 6-month renewal contracts. He hasn't been paying into shakai hoken because his dispatch company told him that since he teaches fewer than 6 hours a day, they can't enroll him. His contract, however, shows that he works 8 hours a day.

His contract with the dispatch company is illegal. The problem is that while the schools are supposed to go through the dispatch company when giving orders or instructions to an ALT, this doesn't happen simply because the ALT is in the school and its easier to give instructions directly. Under the law, the schools should be directly employing ALTs.

A survey done by the news program shows that of the 62 cities they surveyed, 51 BOEs had contracts with dispatch companies. If the education ministry understands that these kinds of contract arrangements are illegal, why are ALTs working under them? The answer comes down to money. The BOEs don't have any, so they look for the cheapest dispatch company. The education ministry, however, appears to have no idea as to how many ALTs are working under this conditions, but plans to investigate.

Comment: The school boards want English to be cheap, fast, and, good but don't realize that they can only pick two of these options in real life. If BOE's want continuity and good lessons, they're going to have to pay for it, but they don't appear to have the budget for this.

The article and the news report illustrate how utterly broken English education is in public schools. Fixing this problem should be straightforward but the BOEs have no money and the education ministry is dragging its feet even though it's aware ALTs are working under illegal contracts.

With NOVA gone, I think it's fair to say that ALT dispatch companies can lay claim to being the worst in the business. They are truly bottom of the barrel.

(video via the General Union)

Update: A subtitled version of the report can be found at Japan Probe.

Yomiuri article

小学英語、外国人の指導助手巡る問題山積

7月28日14時54分配信 読売新聞

２０１１年度から必修化される小学５、６年生の英語の授業について、文部科学省が全国の公立小学校約２万１０００校などを対象に調査を実施したところ、昨年度に小学校で実施された英語授業のうち７割近くで外国語指導助手（ＡＬＴ）が活用されていたことがわかった。

　生の英語を学ぶ機会が定着してきたことが浮き彫りになった形だが、一方では、簡単に授業を投げ出してしまうＡＬＴもいるなど、“質”の問題が浮かび上がっている。

「また辞めるのか」。７月中旬、埼玉県内の市教育委員会の担当者は、業者から米国人ＡＬＴが交代するとの電話連絡を受け、頭を抱えた。４月以降、辞めるのは３人目。１人目は「通勤時間が長い」と小学校に現れず、２人目と３人目は「一身上の都合」などを理由に、１学期の授業だけで、学校から消えた。２学期からは４人目が来る。担当者は「継続性が大事なのにこんなに交代するなんて。児童たちにも説明ができない」と困惑する。

　「人件費を切りつめるから辞めてしまうんだろう」と、埼玉県内のある学校長はうち明ける。この学校のＡＬＴ派遣を請け負った業者は、入札で、昨年の業者に比べてＡＬＴ１人あたり３１万円も安く落札した。

文部科学省によると、ＡＬＴを活用した小学校の授業のうち、国が仲介する「ＪＥＴプログラム」によるものが２５％で、残りは民間業者への委託など。

この市の場合、４０余りの小中学校にＡＬＴ約２０人を派遣する民間業者と契約を結んだが、校長は「風邪で半日休み、給与とボーナスを両方カットされたＡＬＴもいた。なりふり構わぬ業者が増えれば、教育の質は保てなくなる」と危機感を募らせた。

関係者によると、業者の新規参入が目立つようになったのは、小学校英語の必修化が打ち出された０６年ごろから。かつてはＪＥＴプログラムで採用したＡＬＴを自治体が直接雇用するのが主流だった。

しかし、自治体側はＡＬＴが住むアパートを契約したり、交代要員を確保したりしなければならない。民間業者に委託すれば、こうした手続きは不要になるため、業者を活用する自治体が徐々に増えてきた。

The Chunichi Shimbun writes about how Nagoya and Gifu Prefecture are favoring ALTs from private dispatch companies over the goverment-funded JET Programme when it comes to teaching English.

The Asahi Shimbun carried a short blurb that is encouraging news for ALTs in Akita. The Akita school board says it will hire hire it's ALTs as full-time instructors.